eJ does eJournalism

New blog posts on the T-bird

Posted in Uncategorized by emilyjackson24 on March 17, 2010

UBC’s j-schoolers are blogging. How Web 2.0 of us.

My blog, Vancouver gets down to eBusiness, looks at some innovative ways local people are using the big, bad web to make a little bit (read: a lot of) cash.

Check out the posts about selling with social media and creating web-based software.

Why don’t restaurants blog? They really should blog. Blog, blog, blog.

Posted in biz blogs by emilyjackson24 on November 30, 2009

I love restaurants more than most things. They are heavenly places where it is acceptable, and expected, that I don’t/won’t cook. People serve me delicious food that would be impossible for me to create, while simultaneously bringing me thirst-quenching beverages.

I also love being able to find restaurants online. It’s unbelievable how a website can impact someone’s decision to buy a product that has absolutely no relevance in a virtual world.

Enough about me.

TechCrunch.com announced a new platform today called GrabMyTable that helps small restaurants have an online presence. For $60 a month, restaurants can easily market themselves online.

As people frequently search for their new favorite places to eat on their iPhones and on Google, it is incredibly important for any restaurant to have, at the very least, basic online marketing. The more reviews to be found online, from legitimate sources, the better.

GrabMyTable is a fairly simple concept – it allows restaurants to post pictures, menus, and reviews.

But not blogs! Restaurants should blog! Can you imagine – a chef blogs about the fresh fish they’ve brought in, and you comment, “Next week, can you try to get salmon?” Ah, just think of the communication possibilities if restaurants decided to have corporate blogs.

I’m not a huge fan of this new site. I don’t understand what it offers over other existing web technologies. Even the most technology-adverse company can buy its own domain and host a simple website for $25 per year.

Its goal is to create a database of its clients to present to customers. Unless if more people jump on board and use the technology in Vancouver, it’s doubtful that customers will use this as an information source, as it doesn’t have many advantages over competitors like Yelp and Citysearch that provide reviews and commentary.

I think it is great that someone wants to make it easier for restaurants to market themselves online. What I don’t understand is why technology doesn’t seem to solve consumers’ problems better than what’s already available.

It’s a 1.0 start up in a 2.0 world.

Don’t send the invitation if you don’t want to party

Posted in biz blogs by emilyjackson24 on November 25, 2009

Tools are out in full force that make two-way conversations happen between businesses and customers. Corporations don’t have to be inaccessible these days; if they are, it’s a choice.

… Or maybe it’s because they have really poor Twitter skills.

A new report called “Twittervention Study,” (PDF file) created by Weber Shandwick, tells us just how badly the Fortune 100 companies use the social media tool.

The report takes a stab at otherwise successful corporations’ social skills.

These ladies look friendly. Quick, chat them up before they get bored!

“Think of Twitter as the über corporate cocktail party. Your influential guests will stay only if the conversation is entertaining, valuable and interesting.”

With Christmas party season coming up, this should hit pretty close to home. After all, what is Twitter if it’s not a public conversation to showcase your best pick-up lines?

The Twittervention suggests going back to the basics in order to figure out how to make Twitter work. Since I like the cocktail party metaphor, I’ll go with that in my analysis of the report.

1. Listen – Hear what people say to you! Don’t be ‘that guy’ at the party with the monologue. It’s boring, and guaranteed to annoy people.

2. Participate – Why show up if you’re just going to stand by the food table all night?

3. Update frequently with valuable information – No one cares about the boring details of your life, with the possible exception of your mother.

*Special note: as an avid Twitter-er, nothing frustrates me more than constant variations of the same information. This is my favorite point from the folks at Weber Shandwick. It is essential to say something new with every tweet.*

4. Reply to people who talk about issues that are important to your company – At a party, you’re not going to make an effort with the person who only wants to talk about model airplanes – something you know nothing about. You will, however, want to talk to the dreamy stranger with a passion for social media – just like you!

5. Retweet relevant conversations – Sometimes, people take the words right out of your mouth. You can’t help but repeating their insight, but just in case they’re right behind you, you’ve gotta give them credit for it. It makes you more legitimate in their wise eyes, and shows them (and others) that you possess listening skills.

So, what have corporations been doing wrong?

They’ve been using Twitter to push their brands and messages. 26% of the Fortune 100 companies only engaged in one-way conversations.

That’s like showing up at a party and giving a toast that no one asked you to give. Fundamentally, it’s awkward.

Corporations need to use Twitter for its strength as a conversational tool. If not, why bother attending the party?

Tagged with: ,

From YouTube to “YouNews”

Posted in biz blogs by emilyjackson24 on November 24, 2009

Social media gave journalists another reason to look up from the grind last week. In a field that changes pretty quickly these days, YouTube added another catalyst to the mix.

YouTube introduced technology for users to create their own CNN-type “iReports.” If you’re not familiar, iReports allow people to upload videos from their cell phones or cameras in order to get real time broadcasts from anyone with the means to create them… not to mention possess the desire to self-publish. This new way to find the news was integral to the world discovering the disastrous protests in Iran during the 2009 election.

How does it work?

YouTube Direct allows news organizations to put a “post video” link on their websites where citizen journalists could directly upload their news stories. Said videos would then be subject to an internal screening process. Once approved, the videos would be up and running on YouTube and on the news site.

Why is this SO exciting?

This is a great way for news organizations to experiment with social media. Not only does it enable them to move to a two-way street of communication without the technological hassle, but it also gives them the control to post only the legitimate content.

With budgets and profits simultaneously falling, traditional media needs a new way to get people out in the field to capture the news as it happens. This is a cheap way to experiment on the journey from 1.0 to 2.0.

Check out the instructions here:

Get into the Groundswell.

Posted in biz blogs by emilyjackson24 on November 9, 2009

A big part of my world is online, and has been since my first website at age 11. (No, it doesn’t exist anymore – don’t even try to find it!) Groundswell: winning in a world transformed by social technologies, by Charlene Li and Josh Bernoff, strikes a chord with me, partly because it validates all the time I spend in the social media world, but mostly because it lays out the best practices of social technologies in a simple and compelling manner.

I’m not the only one who appreciates the book. In 2009, it won the Berry-AMA Book Prize for the best book in marketing.

What is the groundswell in the first place? Li and Bernoff define it as a “social trend in which people use technology to get things they need from each other instead of companies.”

It’s a world where we care about what other people think and we don’t trust the corporate message. Sounds about right. Groundswell outlines how to win in this arena.

The book emphasizes that relationships are the reason the groundswell has, and will have, such a profound and lasting effect. Relationships between consumers and businesses, consumers and consumers, and businesses and businesses have changed permanently because of the new technologies. The book’s overarching message is that it’s the relationships that matter, not the technologies that enable them.

How have the relationships changed?

Groundswell tactics shift the balance of power to the consumers. Not only can they discuss businesses with each other, but they can also call to attention the things marketing departments would rather keep swept under a rug. They can broadcast (or rather, narrowcast) their opinions on blogs, social networks, or Youtube. People create connections and form communities with those they would never geographically meet in order to produce a running commentary on what is going on at any given moment.

Traditional communication and media has become less relevant in the groundswell. Instead of depending on top down communications, people are more likely to get information from their friends and networks. In Bernoff’s blog, he discusses how he was recently able to answer a question more quickly using Twitter as opposed to Google. Brainpower in social networks can be greater than… google power? Who knew?

How can you participate in the groundswell? The book lists five ways to get involved:

  • Listen → What are people saying about you? What do they want from you?
  • Talk → Engage in conversation. Don’t make your message a lecture.
  • Energize → Get people excited, and they will market for you. For free.
  • Support → Sometimes, people can help each other. You just need to provide the environment.
  • Embrace → Consumer can even generate ideas for you.

Before you decide how to act in the groundswell, you must have clear objectives. In an environment where immediacy rules, Li and Bernoff recommend starting small. Once you get the hang of it, move up the ladder. This is excellent advice. Consequences of botched social media attempts can be huge – after all, “Your brand is whatever your customers say it is.”

Fast fact: over $400 billion was spent on advertising in 2006. This industry “shouts” its messages to people who aren’t inclined to listen. What happens in the groundswell, where shouting doesn’t work?

You must engage in conversations. The book warns that this can be a messy process and acknowledges that it is a complete change in attitude towards marketing. It uses beinggirl.com as an example of what really works to access hard to reach targets. P&G needed a way to market tampons in a way that didn’t make young girls uncomfortable, so, they created an online community where girls could talk about anything. In this community, they had a P&G expert answer the girls’ questions. The branding was subtle, but the ROI was huge. (The book goes into detail about the cost/benefits of this case study. Summary: $$$.)

Instead of freaking out about uncensored communication, companies must evolve from it.

Dell is an example of groundswell hell. In 2005, the “Dell Hell” buzz in the groundswell caused serious trouble for the flailing company. Instead of throwing in the towel, Dell listened to what people had to say, put an executive in control of the situation, and interacted honestly with its consumers. It took a near disaster to whip Dell into motion in the groundswell. The book implores you get involved before your company gets to that point. (Sidenote: Dell now owns ‘Dell Hell’. Talk about groundswell thinking.)

The book puts more value on relationships than technologies. It recognizes that consumers have more power, conversations happen faster online, and that social media must be harnessed correctly to produce results.

It emphasizes that you need to be where your consumers are, not where you want them to be. Even though targeting can be problematic because of the infinite possibilities online, Li and Bernoff recognize that consumers interact in the groundswell in different ways and you need to find out how to reach the ones you want.

Another recommendation is to put someone “high up” in charge of the groundswell. This again speaks to the massive impact the social media world can have on a business. Dealing with it should not be swept to a dark corner of an organization; rather, it should be an integral and high-level part of any company’s plan.

Li and Bernoff tell us that the social media revolution is not a trend, won’t go anywhere, and must be dealt with by someone who knows his or her stuff.

Groundswell’s simplicity and practical application are first class, but for those of us who are already well versed in the world, it is more reaffirming than revolutionary.

This book is a necessary read for business people who are unfamiliar with and scared of social technologies. It provides concrete examples and actionable ideas that serve as starting points for businesses to get involved; however, it might go further to push those of us who are already immersed in the community.

Thunderbird articles up!

Posted in Uncategorized by emilyjackson24 on November 4, 2009

The UBC Graduate School of Journalism first year students posted their first articles on Oct. 28.

Check them out at TheThunderbird.ca.

My article, Refugees lose out in Olympic rush, addresses the influence the Olympics have had on a vulnerable group in Vancouver.

Go team j-school!

Summertime, and the Bud Light Lime goes down easy

Posted in biz blogs by emilyjackson24 on November 3, 2009

It’s hard to predict what makes viral marketing work on Facebook; however, if you successfully reach one person, they can pass your message on to 300 of their nearest and dearest facebook friends in an instant.

Bud Light Lime, beer of choice. Budweiser harnessed this tool effectively over the summer with the launch of its “Bud Light Lime” facebook fan page. One day, one of my friends became a fan and it popped up in my news feed.

The next day, 14 of my friends were fans.

The day after that?

I went out and bought a case of the delicious (read: average) lime concoction and became a fan myself.

82,193 fans later, I’d bet that someone from Bud’s marketing team is patting themselves on the back.

If I got to judge the Webby Awards, I’d put this example at the top of the “Facebook Marketing” category… if one existed.

According to CheckFacebook.com,18-24 year olds are the largest group of Facebook users. Over 50% of them have some post-secondary education. Bud chose the perfect channel to reach its target – students with too much summer vacation time on their hands. It did it in a way that was not seen as obnoxious, intrusive, or contrived.

David Nicholls, brand manager for the beer’s Canada division, told Media in Canada in August, “We’ve gone well beyond the traditional media of just outdoor or television and really done the strong focus of social media and online.”

“It was actually Facebook that we put most of our efforts towards right out of the gates because that’s where there was a group of petitioning fans to bring Bud Light Lime to Canada.”

Love the listening, David. Love it.

Did you know? ‘Cause you probably should.

Posted in biz blogs by emilyjackson24 on October 29, 2009

“Did you know 4.0″ is a gem of a video that showcases just how massive social media’s impact is.

Check it out!

The part that grabs me the most is that  250 million unique users visit facebook, myspace and youtube each month, while a  meager 10 million viewers watch three major news networks. With social websites receiving such attention, it becomes imperative that marketers learn how to use these networks.

After all, you want to be where your customers are.

The video creates the tense question, “What next?” Sure, it’s great to have all this information regarding the huge shift taking place, but what should a marketer do with it?

Traditional marketing may be in steep decline, but (recession aside), people still actively consume. So, solve the problem: reach people in the platforms they use.

Aka – get online, and do it now.

However, there’s a difference between being online and being online effectively. Team Obama certainly nailed down the best practice with its campaign. That equation was: social change + social media = $$$. Its popularity spread from person to person, from network to network. This organic growth toppled McCain, who couldn’t compete via traditional marketing means.

My only issue with this video is that it fails to address demographic information. WHO are the 250 million social media users? Once that’s answered, you can decide WHY you need to get into their worlds.

XPLANE, The Economist, Scott McLeod, Karl Fisch, Laura Bestler teamed up to produce this video. It was released in September 2009, and has already had over 800,000 views on youtube.